ping for [PATCH] gold: Support percent-encoded JSON in --package-metadata

[Benjamin Drung]

On Thu, 2024-12-19 at 06:34 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 2:53 AM Benjamin Drung
> <benjamin.drung@canonical.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 2024-12-19 at 10:18 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > On 19.12.2024 10:14, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > On 17.12.24 13:27, Sam James wrote:
> > > > > Benjamin Drung <benjamin.drung@canonical.com> writes:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Friendly ping since I haven't got a response since submission three
> > > > > > weeks ago.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I recommend CCing the gold maintainers.
> > > > 
> > > > that raises the question, who are these maintainers these days. CCing
> > > > Cary here, but looking at the gold commits, gold seems to be mostly in
> > > > maintenance mode.
> > > 
> > > Irrespective of that binutils/MAINTAINERS is still the canonical reference
> > > to determine who's the maintainer for what. If entries there look
> > > inappropriate, patches will need proposing.
> > 
> > And CCing Ian Lance Taylor after seeing binutils/MAINTAINERS.
> > 
> > It would be useful to have gold/MAINTAINERS pointing to
> > binutils/MAINTAINERS for reference. gold/README says: "See
> > ../binutils/README for more general notes, including where to send bug
> > reports." but gold/README does not talk about where to send patches to.
> 
> This list, binutils@sourceware.org, is the right place.
> 
> That said I'm not tracking the binutils these days.  This patch seems
> fine if it does the same thing as GNU ld.

Yes, this patch does the same as GNU ld and adds the same test cases as
GNU ld.

-- 
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer