[PATCH v2 01/47] gdb, intelgt: add intelgt as a basic machine

[Aktemur, Tankut Baris]

On Monday, December 16, 2024 8:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.12.2024 16:59, Tankut Baris Aktemur wrote:
> > Add 'intelgt' as a basic machine to config.sub.
> >
> > To: <config-patches@gnu.org>
> > To: <binutils@sourceware.org>
> > ---
> >  config.sub | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/config.sub b/config.sub
> > index 2c6a07ab3c34eabed8318ec0a37c0cc23b77a63f..63ff958ec125e543674e9b261d5e5bb2fa749c4e
> 100755
> > --- a/config.sub
> > +++ b/config.sub
> > @@ -1205,6 +1205,7 @@ case $cpu-$vendor in
> >  			| hppa | hppa1.[01] | hppa2.0 | hppa2.0[nw] | hppa64 \
> >  			| hexagon \
> >  			| i370 | i*86 | i860 | i960 | ia16 | ia64 \
> > +			| intelgt \
> >  			| ip2k | iq2000 \
> >  			| k1om \
> >  			| kvx \
> >
> 
> Patch 3 enables ld, but I can't spot any gas enabling (sadly the cover letter
> wasn't Cc-ed to the binutils list).

Sorry, this is my bad.  I'll Cc binutils in the next revision submission.
For the time being, the link to the cover letter is

  https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2024-December/214029.html

> Don't you further need to exclude gas from
> attempts of configuring?
> 
> I'm also puzzled by that difference: The series supposedly is about enabling
> gdb. Why enable ld there? Just because it's (seemingly) easy?
> 
> Jan

Without enabling ld, when configured as

  <src>/configure --enable-targets="intelgt-elf"

'make' gives

  *** ld does not support target intelgt-unknown-elf
  *** see ld/configure.tgt for supported targets

Regards
-Baris


Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Sean Fennelly, Jeffrey Schneiderman, Tiffany Doon Silva
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928