[PATCH] PR30437 aarch64: make RELA relocs idempotent
Michael Matz
matz@suse.de
Thu May 25 12:29:42 GMT 2023
Hello,
On Thu, 25 May 2023, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed explanation. That makes sense, overall. However...
>
> I didn't think we had separate relocation rules for REL/RELA format
> relocs. I know that we recommend RELA for aarch64, but how would an
> object file with REL format relocs be handled if src_mask is always
> zero?
Right now the aarch64 bfd backend only support RELA
(elf_backend_may_use_rel_p is off). elf64-mips is an example that
supports both, and it has separate howto tables for rel and rela
descriptors (e.g. mips_elf64_howto_table_rel and
mips_elf64_howto_table_rela), with the appropriate
src_mask/partial_inplace settings depending on rel/rela:
HOWTO (R_MIPS_32, /* type */
...
true, /* partial_inplace */
0xffffffff, /* src_mask */
0xffffffff, /* dst_mask */
vs.
HOWTO (R_MIPS_32, /* type */
...
false, /* partial_inplace */
0, /* src_mask */
0xffffffff, /* dst_mask */
the rtype_to_howto backend routine appropriately switches between those
depending on side-info passed in parameters. (Whereas the name_lookup and
type_lookup routines always use the rela tables and contain a FIXME
comment to that effect :) ). Various non-mips embedded targets try to
also support this, but often only for read-in, not for generating both
types of relocs, and so get away with only one howto table. (I believe (!)
mips is the only one that actively tries to get REL+RELA support correct).
Ciao,
Michael.
More information about the Binutils
mailing list