PR29189, dlltool delaylibs corrupt float/double arguments

Jan Beulich jbeulich@suse.com
Fri May 19 07:11:44 GMT 2023


On 18.05.2023 01:52, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 12:18:15PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.05.2023 02:52, Alan Modra wrote:
>>> PR29189 is an excellent bug report.  The reporter debugged the problem
>>> to the point of finding out exactly where things were going wrong (in
>>> a windows dll, so not a mingw problem) and even supplied a fix, giving
>>> an ABI reference.  There hasn't been any action on the bug report due
>>> to lack of an active mingw binutils maintainer, so I thought I'd take
>>> a look as part of trying to whittle down the enormous number of
>>> binutils bugzilla entries.
>>>
>>> This is a rewrite of the patch given in the PR.  (It might even
>>> resemble code emitted by Microsoft's LINK.EXE as reported in
>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org/msg55205.html).
>>> I'm not going to apply it without review from an x86 maintainer,
>>> because it's been too long since I did any serious x86 specific work
>>> and I don't want to break things for someone running an original amd64
>>> machine.  The patch needs to be tested too.  I don't have a mingw
>>> setup.
>>>
>>> 	PR 29189
>>> 	* dlltool.c (i386_x64_trampoline): Save and restore xmm0-3.  Make
>>> 	use of parameter save area for integer arg regs.  Comment.
>>
>> The change looks good to me, and I'm inclined to suggest that we postpone
>> dealing with wider vector registers (it's not just AVX, but also AVX512
>> which may need dealing with), in the hope that the system DLLs would only
>> ever touch the XMM ones, and only via legacy (pre-AVX) instructions (thus
>> leaving their upper halves / three quarters intact).
> 
> Yes, I think the same.  "only via pre-AVX insns" is more of a concern
> than any real vector processing occurring.
> 
>> However, I'm inclined to suggest that we deal with %xmm4 and %xmm5 right
>> away: They're not callee preserved, so even a legacy-only system DLL
>> might clobber their low half/quarter.
> 
> That sounds very reasonable.  Here's an updated patch.
> 
> 	PR 29189
> 	* dlltool.c (i386_x64_trampoline): Save and restore xmm0-5.  Make
> 	use of parameter save area for integer arg regs.  Comment.

Lgtm, fwiw. One more remark though (you may want to further extend the
comment):

> --- a/binutils/dlltool.c
> +++ b/binutils/dlltool.c
> @@ -583,22 +583,48 @@ static const char i386_trampoline[] =
>    "\tpopl %%ecx\n"
>    "\tjmp *%%eax\n";
>  
> +/* Save integer arg regs in parameter space reserved by our caller
> +   above the return address.  Allocate space for six fp arg regs plus
> +   parameter space possibly used by __delayLoadHelper2 plus alignment.
> +   We enter with the stack offset from 16-byte alignment by the return
> +   address, so allocate 96 + 32 + 8 = 136 bytes.  Note that only the
> +   first four xmm regs are used to pass fp args, but the first six
> +   vector ymm (zmm too?) are used to pass vector args.  We are
> +   assuming that volatile vector regs are not modified inside
> +   __delayLoadHelper2.  However, it is known that at least xmm0 and
> +   xmm1 are trashed in some versions of Microsoft dlls, and if xmm4 or
> +   xmm5 are also used then that would trash the lower bits of ymm4 and
> +   ymm5.  If it turns out that vector insns with a vex prefix are used
> +   then we'll need to save ymm0-5 here but that can't be done without
> +   first testing cpuid to see whether the instructions are available.  */

Checking CPUID alone isn't going to be sufficient. XCR0 would also need
consulting.

Jan

>  static const char i386_x64_trampoline[] =
> -  "\tsubq $72, %%rsp\n"
> -  "\t.seh_stackalloc 72\n"
> +  "\tsubq $136, %%rsp\n"
> +  "\t.seh_stackalloc 136\n"
>    "\t.seh_endprologue\n"
> -  "\tmovq %%rcx, 64(%%rsp)\n"
> -  "\tmovq %%rdx, 56(%%rsp)\n"
> -  "\tmovq %%r8, 48(%%rsp)\n"
> -  "\tmovq %%r9, 40(%%rsp)\n"
> -  "\tmovq  %%rax, %%rdx\n"
> -  "\tleaq  __DELAY_IMPORT_DESCRIPTOR_%s(%%rip), %%rcx\n"
> +  "\tmovq %%rcx, 136+8(%%rsp)\n"
> +  "\tmovq %%rdx, 136+16(%%rsp)\n"
> +  "\tmovq %%r8, 136+24(%%rsp)\n"
> +  "\tmovq %%r9, 136+32(%%rsp)\n"
> +  "\tmovaps %%xmm0, 32(%%rsp)\n"
> +  "\tmovaps %%xmm1, 48(%%rsp)\n"
> +  "\tmovaps %%xmm2, 64(%%rsp)\n"
> +  "\tmovaps %%xmm3, 80(%%rsp)\n"
> +  "\tmovaps %%xmm4, 96(%%rsp)\n"
> +  "\tmovaps %%xmm5, 112(%%rsp)\n"
> +  "\tmovq %%rax, %%rdx\n"
> +  "\tleaq __DELAY_IMPORT_DESCRIPTOR_%s(%%rip), %%rcx\n"
>    "\tcall __delayLoadHelper2\n"
> -  "\tmovq 40(%%rsp), %%r9\n"
> -  "\tmovq 48(%%rsp), %%r8\n"
> -  "\tmovq 56(%%rsp), %%rdx\n"
> -  "\tmovq 64(%%rsp), %%rcx\n"
> -  "\taddq $72, %%rsp\n"
> +  "\tmovq 136+8(%%rsp), %%rcx\n"
> +  "\tmovq 136+16(%%rsp), %%rdx\n"
> +  "\tmovq 136+24(%%rsp), %%r8\n"
> +  "\tmovq 136+32(%%rsp), %%r9\n"
> +  "\tmovaps 32(%%rsp), %%xmm0\n"
> +  "\tmovaps 48(%%rsp), %%xmm1\n"
> +  "\tmovaps 64(%%rsp), %%xmm2\n"
> +  "\tmovaps 80(%%rsp), %%xmm3\n"
> +  "\tmovaps 96(%%rsp), %%xmm4\n"
> +  "\tmovaps 112(%%rsp), %%xmm5\n"
> +  "\taddq $136, %%rsp\n"
>    "\tjmp *%%rax\n";
>  
>  struct mac
> 



More information about the Binutils mailing list