[PATCH v3] PR30592 objcopy: allow --set-section-flags to add or remove SHF_X86_64_LARGE
Alan Modra
amodra@gmail.com
Fri Jul 7 08:24:27 GMT 2023
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 10:43:06PM -0700, Fangrui Song via Binutils wrote:
> include/
> * elf/common.h: Define SHF_X86_64_LARGE to be used by elf.c.
Don't do this.
> --- a/bfd/elf.c
> +++ b/bfd/elf.c
> @@ -1045,6 +1045,11 @@ _bfd_elf_make_section_from_shdr (bfd *abfd,
> if ((hdr->sh_flags & SHF_EXCLUDE) != 0)
> flags |= SEC_EXCLUDE;
>
> + bed = get_elf_backend_data (abfd);
> + if (bed->elf_machine_code == EM_X86_64 &&
> + (hdr->sh_flags & SHF_X86_64_LARGE) != 0)
> + flags |= SEC_ELF_LARGE;
Or this. Instead write an elf_backend_section_flags for x86_64.
> @@ -3912,6 +3916,8 @@ elf_fake_sections (bfd *abfd, asection *asect, void *fsarg)
> }
> if ((asect->flags & (SEC_GROUP | SEC_EXCLUDE)) == SEC_EXCLUDE)
> this_hdr->sh_flags |= SHF_EXCLUDE;
> + if (bed->elf_machine_code == EM_X86_64 && (asect->flags & SEC_ELF_LARGE) != 0)
> + this_hdr->sh_flags |= SHF_X86_64_LARGE;
>
Or this. Instead write elf_backend_fake_sections for x86_64.
> /* If the section has relocs, set up a section header for the
> SHT_REL[A] section. If two relocation sections are required for
> @@ -8508,6 +8514,10 @@ _bfd_elf_init_private_section_data (bfd *ibfd,
> elf_section_flags (osec) = (elf_section_flags (isec)
> & (SHF_MASKOS | SHF_MASKPROC));
>
> + /* objcopy --set-section-flags without "large" drops SHF_X86_64_LARGE. */
> + if (get_elf_backend_data (ibfd)->elf_machine_code == EM_X86_64)
> + elf_section_flags (osec) = (elf_section_flags (isec) & ~SHF_X86_64_LARGE);
> +
> /* Copy sh_info from input for mbind section. */
> if ((elf_tdata (ibfd)->has_gnu_osabi & elf_gnu_osabi_mbind) != 0
> && elf_section_flags (isec) & SHF_GNU_MBIND)
And this should be done in a bfd_elf64_bfd_copy_private_symbol_data
for x86_64.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
More information about the Binutils
mailing list