Ping: [PATCH 2/3] RISC-V: move OR and XOR aliases down

Jan Beulich jbeulich@suse.com
Fri Jan 20 09:23:22 GMT 2023


On 13.01.2023 11:19, Jan Beulich via Binutils wrote:
> While benign right now, everywhere else register forms come ahead of
> immediate (alias) ones. That way both also end up next to their non-
> alias (i-suffixed) forms, making it easier to see that the pairs are
> identical (except for INSN_ALIAS of course).

Considering other replies I understand that patches 1 and 3 may be
controversial, and a different route wants actually taking towards
consistency. But I think the change here is orthogonal to that (yet
to be had) discussion, so may I ask for arch maintainer approval
here?

Thanks, Jan

> --- a/opcodes/riscv-opc.c
> +++ b/opcodes/riscv-opc.c
> @@ -438,10 +438,10 @@ const struct riscv_opcode riscv_opcodes[
>  {"lw",          0, INSN_CLASS_I, "d,o(s)",    MATCH_LW, MASK_LW, match_opcode, INSN_DREF|INSN_4_BYTE },
>  {"lw",          0, INSN_CLASS_I, "d,A",       0, (int) M_LW, match_never, INSN_MACRO },
>  {"not",         0, INSN_CLASS_I, "d,s",       MATCH_XORI|MASK_IMM, MASK_XORI|MASK_IMM, match_opcode, INSN_ALIAS },
> -{"or",          0, INSN_CLASS_I, "d,s,j",     MATCH_ORI, MASK_ORI, match_opcode, INSN_ALIAS },
>  {"or",          0, INSN_CLASS_C, "Cs,Cw,Ct",  MATCH_C_OR, MASK_C_OR, match_opcode, INSN_ALIAS },
>  {"or",          0, INSN_CLASS_C, "Cs,Ct,Cw",  MATCH_C_OR, MASK_C_OR, match_opcode, INSN_ALIAS },
>  {"or",          0, INSN_CLASS_I, "d,s,t",     MATCH_OR, MASK_OR, match_opcode, 0 },
> +{"or",          0, INSN_CLASS_I, "d,s,j",     MATCH_ORI, MASK_ORI, match_opcode, INSN_ALIAS },
>  {"ori",         0, INSN_CLASS_I, "d,s,j",     MATCH_ORI, MASK_ORI, match_opcode, 0 },
>  {"auipc",       0, INSN_CLASS_I, "d,u",       MATCH_AUIPC, MASK_AUIPC, match_opcode, 0 },
>  {"seqz",        0, INSN_CLASS_I, "d,s",       MATCH_SLTIU|ENCODE_ITYPE_IMM (1), MASK_SLTIU | MASK_IMM, match_opcode, INSN_ALIAS },
> @@ -476,10 +476,10 @@ const struct riscv_opcode riscv_opcodes[
>  {"rdtimeh",    32, INSN_CLASS_I, "d",         MATCH_RDTIMEH, MASK_RDTIMEH, match_opcode, INSN_ALIAS },
>  {"ecall",       0, INSN_CLASS_I, "",          MATCH_SCALL, MASK_SCALL, match_opcode, 0 },
>  {"scall",       0, INSN_CLASS_I, "",          MATCH_SCALL, MASK_SCALL, match_opcode, 0 },
> -{"xor",         0, INSN_CLASS_I, "d,s,j",     MATCH_XORI, MASK_XORI, match_opcode, INSN_ALIAS },
>  {"xor",         0, INSN_CLASS_C, "Cs,Cw,Ct",  MATCH_C_XOR, MASK_C_XOR, match_opcode, INSN_ALIAS },
>  {"xor",         0, INSN_CLASS_C, "Cs,Ct,Cw",  MATCH_C_XOR, MASK_C_XOR, match_opcode, INSN_ALIAS },
>  {"xor",         0, INSN_CLASS_I, "d,s,t",     MATCH_XOR, MASK_XOR, match_opcode, 0 },
> +{"xor",         0, INSN_CLASS_I, "d,s,j",     MATCH_XORI, MASK_XORI, match_opcode, INSN_ALIAS },
>  {"xori",        0, INSN_CLASS_I, "d,s,j",     MATCH_XORI, MASK_XORI, match_opcode, 0 },
>  {"lwu",        64, INSN_CLASS_I, "d,o(s)",    MATCH_LWU, MASK_LWU, match_opcode, INSN_DREF|INSN_4_BYTE },
>  {"lwu",        64, INSN_CLASS_I, "d,A",       0, (int) M_LWU, match_never, INSN_MACRO },
> 



More information about the Binutils mailing list