[PATCH 1/2] ld: Fix relocatable.d XFAIL/notarget entry for hppa

[Sam James]

Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> writes:

> On 08.08.2023 19:53, Sam James wrote:
>> 
>> Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> writes:
>> 
>>> On 08.08.2023 03:23, Sam James via Binutils wrote:
>>>> PR 30734
>>>> * ld/testsuite/ld-elf/relocatable.d: Fix notarget entry for hppa to match
>>>>   hppa{1.1,2.0}*, like hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu which Gentoo uses.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
>>>
>>> Since the two patches deal with the only two outliers, I'd consider these
>>> to be at least very close to obvious. Feel free to put in. Yet in the
>>> future for arch-specific changes please remember to Cc respective arch
>>> maintainers.
>> 
>> 1. ACK, pushed. Thank you. Sorry, I was a bit too conservative here.
>> 2. Fair point, I will do this in future.
>> 
>> What's the rule for backports? Can I just do those if obvious?
>
> Unless while the tree is closed, I'd say generally yes, but after waiting
> a little (to see whether there's fallout nevertheless, as appears to be
> the case here). Of course it also doesn't hurt asking.
>
>> What
>> about if they're not my commits but I've tested them and they're
>> straightforward?
>
> I'm less sure here - I, for one, would ask in such a case, despite (now)
> being global maintainer.

Thank you for the advice Jan!