[PATCH v2] x86: Remove libopcodes dependency

[Jan Beulich]

On 29.11.2022 00:49, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 2:19 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>> On 22.11.2022 19:19, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> --- a/gas/Makefile.am
>>> +++ b/gas/Makefile.am
>>> @@ -446,6 +446,12 @@ development.exp: $(BFDDIR)/development.sh
>>>       $(EGREP) "(development|experimental)=" $(BFDDIR)/development.sh  \
>>>         | $(AWK) -F= '{ print "set " $$1 " " $$2 }' > $@
>>>
>>> +$(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-init.h $(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-tbl.h: \
>>> +     @MAINT@ $(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-opc.tbl \
>>> +     $(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-reg.tbl \
>>> +     $(srcdir)/../opcodes/i386-opc.h
>>> +     cd ../opcodes; make gen-i386-tbl
>>
>> I've made a patch to gas/Makefile.am as you have requested in reply to
>> my series. I will want to put that through some more testing, so I will
>> submit a v3 of that only a little later (and of course only unless you
>> submit a v2 of your patch earlier that I would also end up being okay
>> with). In the course of doing so I noticed a few more issues with your
>> change:
>>
>> For one I don't think you can put @MAINT@ on a continued line, as the
>> line continuation might then be hidden when @MAINT@ expands to #. The
>> list of dependencies wants expressing via a variable, which would then
>> be used immediately after @MAINT@ without any line continuation
>> following.
> 
> Fixed.

No, the same problem is still there. You either need to use a very long
line, or you need to introduce a variable holding the list of prereqs,
like I've done in my series.

>> And then your rule / dependency won't be enough on a "maintainer-clean"
>> tree, i.e. when the generated headers aren't there at all, and when
>> config/.deps/tc-i386.Po is still empty. In that case nothing would
>> trigger their generation; an explicit dependency of config/tc-i386.o on
>> these headers needs adding here.
> 
> Fixed.
> 
>> Finally you're missing a dependency of the generated headers on
>> i386-gen.c.
> 
> They have a dependency on i386-gen which depends on i386-gen.c.

In opcodes/, yes, but talk was about the rule in gas/. Yet despite
your comment above I see that you've added the missing dependency.

> Here is the v2 patch.

As said in reply to v1 - my objection to this particular use of make
recursion remains.

I also continue to be irritated by you specifically having asked me
to further split my series, when you do everything in a single patch.

One further request at least for consideration: In my v3 I've moved
the inclusion of opcodes/i386-tbl.h quite a bit further down in
tc-i386.c, as I think it's preferable that way (not introducing the
static arrays earlier than necessary).

Jan