[PATCH v3 0/3] RISC-V: Better support for long instructions (64 < x <= 176 [bits])

[Tsukasa OI]

Hello,

c.f. PATCH v1 (with cover letter with some backgrounds):
<https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-November/124516.html>
c.f. PATCH v2:
<https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-November/124596.html>
c.f. PATCH v3:
<https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-November/124643.html>


[Changes: v3 -> v4]

1.  Split to three separate patches
    (disassembler fix, assembler fix and testcases that require both fixes)
2.  PATCH 1/3: Further clarification of the intent of this commit
    (with examples) on the commit message.  No changes in the code.
3.  PATCH 2/3: Minor clarification on comments and the commit message.
    No code changes but some comment changes in tc-riscv.c.
4.  PATCH 3/3: Clarify that it tests both fixes.


[Changes: v2 -> v3]

1.  PATCH v2 1/2 is removed
2.  PATCH v2 2/2 is splitted to PATCH v3 {1,2}/2
    based on the feedback of Jan
    Strict ".byte" testcases are only preserved to test new behavior.
    They are not 4-byte aligned (10 and 22-bytes) and unlikely to change
    any time soon.


[Changes: v1 -> v2]

1.  Rebased (as usual)
2.  PATCH 2/2: Simplified the logic to extract low instruction bits
    (will describe later)
3.  PATCH 2/2: Changed the commit message slightly


Thanks,
Tsukasa




Tsukasa OI (3):
  RISC-V: Better support for long instructions (disassembler)
  RISC-V: Better support for long instructions (assembler)
  RISC-V: Better support for long instructions (tests)

 gas/config/tc-riscv.c                | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/insn-dwarf.d | 10 ++++++-
 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/insn-na.d    |  8 ++++++
 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/insn.d       | 22 +++++++++++++++
 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/insn.s       |  9 ++++++
 opcodes/riscv-dis.c                  | 14 ++++++----
 6 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)


base-commit: ac8df5a1921904b3928429e696ad8b40c612f829
-- 
2.38.1