[PATCH 1/2] RISC-V: Make .insn tests stricter
Jan Beulich
jbeulich@suse.com
Mon Nov 21 07:32:30 GMT 2022
On 19.11.2022 08:10, Tsukasa OI wrote:
> To make sure that all instruction bits are dumped through ".byte", this
> commit makes matching patterns stricter (to cover all instruction bits).
Hmm, it was deliberate to omit the .<n>byte part of the disassembly,
very specifically because of the inconsistency of using <n> only in
some cases. Personally I would agree with such tightening of the
expectations only if the disassembler was first improved. But of
course it's the maintainers judgement ...
Jan
> --- a/gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/insn-na.d
> +++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/insn-na.d
> @@ -61,15 +61,15 @@ Disassembly of section .text:
> [^:]+:[ ]+022180d7[ ]+vadd\.vv[ ]+v1,v2,v3
> [^:]+:[ ]+0001[ ]+c\.addi[ ]+zero,0
> [^:]+:[ ]+00000013[ ]+addi[ ]+zero,zero,0
> -[^:]+:[ ]+001f 0000 0000[ ].*
> -[^:]+:[ ]+0000003f 00000000[ ].*
> -[^:]+:[ ]+007f 0000 0000 0000 0000[ ]+[._a-z].*
> -[^:]+:[ ]+0000107f 00000000 00000000[ ]+[._a-z].*
> -[^:]+:[ ]+607f 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000[ ]+[._a-z].*
> +[^:]+:[ ]+001f 0000 0000[ ]+\.byte[ ]+0x1f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> +[^:]+:[ ]+0000003f 00000000[ ]+\.8byte[ ]+0x3f
> +[^:]+:[ ]+007f 0000 0000 0000 0000[ ]+\.byte[ ]+0x7f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> +[^:]+:[ ]+0000107f 00000000 00000000[ ]+\.byte[ ]+0x7f, 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> +[^:]+:[ ]+607f 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000[ ]+\.byte[ ]+0x7f, 0x60, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> [^:]+:[ ]+0001[ ]+c\.addi[ ]+zero,0
> [^:]+:[ ]+00000013[ ]+addi[ ]+zero,zero,0
> -[^:]+:[ ]+001f 0000 0000[ ].*
> -[^:]+:[ ]+0000003f 00000000[ ].*
> -[^:]+:[ ]+007f 0000 0000 0000 0000[ ]+[._a-z].*
> -[^:]+:[ ]+0000107f 00000000 00000000[ ]+[._a-z].*
> -[^:]+:[ ]+607f 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000[ ]+[._a-z].*
> +[^:]+:[ ]+001f 0000 0000[ ]+\.byte[ ]+0x1f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> +[^:]+:[ ]+0000003f 00000000[ ]+\.8byte[ ]+0x3f
> +[^:]+:[ ]+007f 0000 0000 0000 0000[ ]+\.byte[ ]+0x7f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> +[^:]+:[ ]+0000107f 00000000 00000000[ ]+\.byte[ ]+0x7f, 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> +[^:]+:[ ]+607f 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000[ ]+\.byte[ ]+0x7f, 0x60, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> diff --git a/gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/insn.d b/gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/insn.d
> index 2e5d35b39702..cf84f177af39 100644
> --- a/gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/insn.d
> +++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/insn.d
> @@ -83,12 +83,12 @@ Disassembly of section .text:
> [^:]+:[ ]+0000 0000 0000 ?
> [^:]+:[ ]+0001[ ]+nop
> [^:]+:[ ]+00000013[ ]+nop
> -[^:]+:[ ]+001f 0000 0000[ ].*
> -[^:]+:[ ]+0000003f 00000000[ ].*
> -[^:]+:[ ]+007f 0000 0000 0000[ ]+[._a-z].*
> +[^:]+:[ ]+001f 0000 0000[ ]+\.byte[ ]+0x1f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> +[^:]+:[ ]+0000003f 00000000[ ]+\.8byte[ ]+0x3f
> +[^:]+:[ ]+007f 0000 0000 0000[ ]+\.byte[ ]+0x7f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> [^:]+:[ ]+0000 ?
> -[^:]+:[ ]+0000107f 00000000[ ]+[._a-z].*
> +[^:]+:[ ]+0000107f 00000000[ ]+\.byte[ ]+0x7f, 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> [^:]+:[ ]+00000000 ?
> -[^:]+:[ ]+607f 0000 0000 0000[ ]+[._a-z].*
> +[^:]+:[ ]+607f 0000 0000 0000[ ]+\.byte[ ]+0x7f, 0x60, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> [^:]+:[ ]+0000 0000 0000 0000 ?
> [^:]+:[ ]+0000 0000 0000 ?
More information about the Binutils
mailing list