gprofng patch to review
Vladimir Mezentsev
vladimir.mezentsev@oracle.com
Wed Nov 9 18:50:42 GMT 2022
On 11/9/22 07:00, Kurt Goebel wrote:
>
>
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-November/124238.html
Hi Markus,
It looks like you sent patch for review to the gdb alias.
I am only in binutils@sourceware.org.
See my comments below.
[PATCH 1/2] gprofng: make cpu identification available to others
Markus Metzger markus.t.metzger@intel.com
Tue Nov 8 05:45:29 GMT 2022
Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] x86: Correct wrong comments in
vex_w_table
Next message (by thread): [PATCH 2/2] gdb, btrace: use cpuident.h to
implement btrace_this_cpu
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I ran gprofng.display/display.exp on Fedora 36 x86-64 and I got
UNSUPPORTED: jsynprog
It is expected. You built gprofng without java profiling support.
ERROR: comparison of results in mttest failed
UNRESOLVED: mttest
ERROR: comparison of results in mttest failed
UNRESOLVED: mttest
PASS: synprog
PASS: synprog
Usually, when synprog passes and mttest fails, it means that
pthread_create interposition is broken in libgp-collector.so.
In any case, it is not result of your patch.
I never run gprofng on Fedora 36.
Please create a bug against gprofng and describe how you configure your
build.
with and without this patch.
---
gprofng/common/hwcdrv.c | 2 +-
gprofng/common/cpuid.c => include/cpuident.h | 17 +++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
rename gprofng/common/cpuid.c => include/cpuident.h (96%)
diff --git a/gprofng/common/hwcdrv.c b/gprofng/common/hwcdrv.c
index 03c3a71c8e2..115638aa623 100644
--- a/gprofng/common/hwcdrv.c
+++ b/gprofng/common/hwcdrv.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
/* macros */
#define IS_GLOBAL /* Mark global symbols */
-#include "cpuid.c" /* ftns for identifying a chip */
+#include "cpuident.h" /* ftns for identifying a chip */
static hdrv_pcbe_api_t hdrv_pcbe_core_api;
static hdrv_pcbe_api_t hdrv_pcbe_opteron_api;
diff --git a/gprofng/common/cpuid.c b/include/cpuident.h
similarity index 96%
rename from gprofng/common/cpuid.c
rename to include/cpuident.h
index 211e09aa8ac..7ab6fc1f2b1 100644
--- a/gprofng/common/cpuid.c
+++ b/include/cpuident.h
@@ -18,6 +18,11 @@
Foundation, 51 Franklin Street - Fifth Floor, Boston,
MA 02110-1301, USA. */
+#ifndef _CPUIDENT_H
+#define _CPUIDENT_H
+
+#include <stdint.h>
+
#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64)
#include <cpuid.h> /* GCC-provided */
#elif defined(__aarch64__)
@@ -85,7 +90,7 @@ typedef struct
#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64)
-static uint_t
+static unsigned int
cpuid_vendorstr_to_vendorcode (char *vendorstr)
{
if (strcmp (vendorstr, X86_VENDORSTR_Intel) == 0)
@@ -101,8 +106,10 @@ my_cpuid (unsigned int op, cpuid_regs_t *regs)
{
regs->eax = regs->ebx = regs->ecx = regs->edx = 0;
int ret = __get_cpuid (op, ®s->eax, ®s->ebx, ®s->ecx,
®s->edx);
+#ifdef DBG_LT1
TprintfT (DBG_LT1, "my_cpuid: __get_cpuid(0x%x, 0x%x, 0x%x, 0x%x,
0x%x) returns %d\n",
op, regs->eax, regs->ebx, regs->ecx, regs->edx, ret);
+#endif
I suggest to just remove TprintfT. This debug output is currently not
used by anyone.
Thanks for fixing this, and please check it in.
-Vladimir
return ret;
}
#endif
@@ -184,20 +191,22 @@ get_cpuid_info ()
return cpi;
}
-static inline uint_t
+static inline unsigned int
cpuid_getvendor ()
{
return get_cpuid_info ()->cpi_vendor;
}
-static inline uint_t
+static inline unsigned int
cpuid_getfamily ()
{
return get_cpuid_info ()->cpi_family;
}
-static inline uint_t
+static inline unsigned int
cpuid_getmodel ()
{
return get_cpuid_info ()->cpi_model;
}
+
+#endif /* _CPUIDENT_H */
--
2.37.3
More information about the Binutils
mailing list