[PATCH] x86/Intel: don't accept malformed EXTRQ / INSERTQ

[H.J. Lu]

On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 3:29 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> Operand swapping was mistakenly suppressed when the first two operands
> were immediate ones, not taking into account overall operand count. This
> way EXTRQ / INSERTQ would have been accepted also with kind-of-AT&T
> operand order.
>
> For the testcase being extended, in order to not move around "GAS
> LISTING" expectations, suppress pagination.
>
> --- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c
> +++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
> @@ -4885,7 +4885,8 @@ md_assemble (char *line)
>        && !startswith (mnemonic, "rmp")
>        && (strcmp (mnemonic, "tpause") != 0)
>        && (strcmp (mnemonic, "umwait") != 0)
> -      && !(operand_type_check (i.types[0], imm)
> +      && !(i.operands == 2
> +          && operand_type_check (i.types[0], imm)
>            && operand_type_check (i.types[1], imm)))
>      swap_operands ();
>
> --- a/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp
> +++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ if [gas_32_check] then {
>
>      run_list_test "float" "-al -mmnemonic=att"
>      run_list_test "general" "-al --listing-lhs-width=2"
> -    run_list_test "inval" "-al"
> +    run_list_test "inval" "-aln"
>      run_list_test "inval-16" "-al"
>      run_list_test "segment" "-al"
>      run_list_test "inval-seg" "-al"
> --- a/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/inval.l
> +++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/inval.l
> @@ -87,19 +87,18 @@
>  .*:97: Error: .*shl.*
>  .*:98: Error: .*rol.*
>  .*:99: Error: .*rcl.*
> -.*:102: Error: .*
> -.*:104: Error: .*
> +.*:101: Error: .*extrq.*
> +.*:102: Error: .*insertq.*
>  .*:105: Error: .*
> -.*:106: Error: .*
> +.*:107: Error: .*
>  .*:108: Error: .*
>  .*:109: Error: .*
> -.*:110: Error: .*
> +.*:111: Error: .*
>  .*:112: Error: .*
>  .*:113: Error: .*
> -.*:114: Error: .*
> -GAS LISTING .*
> -
> -
> +.*:115: Error: .*
> +.*:116: Error: .*
> +.*:117: Error: .*
>  [      ]*1[    ]+\.text
>  [      ]*2[    ]+\.allow_index_reg
>  [      ]*3[    ]+\# All the following should be illegal
> @@ -157,9 +156,6 @@ GAS LISTING .*
>  [      ]*55[   ]+fnstsw %al
>  [      ]*56[   ]+fstsw %eax
>  [      ]*57[   ]+fstsw %al
> - GAS LISTING .*
> -
> -
>  [      ]*58[   ]+
>  [      ]*59[   ]+movnti %ax, \(%eax\)
>  [      ]*60[   ]+movntiw %ax, \(%eax\)
> @@ -203,6 +199,9 @@ GAS LISTING .*
>  [      ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+rol \[ecx\], 2
>  [      ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+rcl \[edx\], cl
>  [      ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+
> +[      ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+extrq 1, 2, xmm3
> +[      ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+insertq 1, 2, xmm3, xmm4
> +[      ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+
>  [      ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+\.att_syntax prefix
>  [      ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+movsd \(%esi\), %ss:\(%edi\), %ss:\(%eax\)
>  [      ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+
> @@ -217,6 +216,4 @@ GAS LISTING .*
>  [      ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+inb   %dx, %ax
>  [      ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+outb  %ax, %dx
>  [      ]*[1-9][0-9]*[  ]+movb  %ax, %bx
> - GAS LISTING .*
> -
> -
> +#pass
> --- a/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/inval.s
> +++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/inval.s
> @@ -98,6 +98,9 @@ movnti word ptr [eax], ax
>         rol [ecx], 2
>         rcl [edx], cl
>
> +       extrq 1, 2, xmm3
> +       insertq 1, 2, xmm3, xmm4
> +
>         .att_syntax prefix
>         movsd (%esi), %ss:(%edi), %ss:(%eax)
>

OK.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.