32-bit archs, want64=true, and gas integers
Jan Beulich
jbeulich@suse.com
Fri May 6 11:55:55 GMT 2022
On 06.05.2022 12:43, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I've never looked at gas code before, but I found the the code that parses integers,
> and it seems to automatically handle integers larger than 64-bit, by promoting to bignum.
> Maybe the ideal or the original intent was for integers to behave as as they had unlimited
> precision,
Well, not unlimited, but far higher.
> with non-bignum integers being an optimization? And then make sure that all
> operations, including division would handle bignums too?
Don't know. To me the limitations of bignum don't look as if that might
have been the plan.
> Anyhow, here's a tentative patch of what I was imagining. I'm not set up for testing
> this properly. I was hoping one of you guys would like the idea so much that
> you'd run with it. :-)
It look plausible at the first glance, but ...
> If something like this went in, then I assume that cris could go back to not setting
> want64=yes.
>
> From 7fbbecc9eacd7e5dac076bfc25b099b9ff0ca1ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
> Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 11:15:11 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gas: make non-bignum integers be always 64-bit
>
> Currently, on 32-bit hosts, gas integers are either 32-bit or 64-bit,
> depending on --enable-64-bit-bfd. Make valueT be always uint64_t to
> make gas behave the same on all hosts.
>
> Change-Id: I6258dfcd975ea9abb9cc4eb1d4e604a077df3033
> ---
> gas/as.h | 2 +-
> gas/expr.c | 65 ++++++++++++++----------------------------------------
> gas/expr.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gas/as.h b/gas/as.h
> index 135abc8f23d..5b636cfd59a 100644
> --- a/gas/as.h
> +++ b/gas/as.h
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ typedef bfd_vma addressT;
> typedef bfd_signed_vma offsetT;
>
> /* Type of symbol value, etc. For use in prototypes. */
> -typedef addressT valueT;
> +typedef uint64_t valueT;
... I'd be afraid this might alter behavior for purely 32-bit targets.
Whether such a behavioral change would be deemed okay I'm not sure.
Jan
More information about the Binutils
mailing list