[PATCH] Don't define ARCH_cris for BFD64

[Alan Modra]

On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 09:15:43AM +0100, Luis Machado wrote:
> On 5/4/22 09:08, Alan Modra wrote:
> > On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 08:56:28AM +0100, Luis Machado via Binutils wrote:
> > > I believe it is a mistake to define ARCH_cris when BFD64 is defined. It is
> > > a 32-bit architecture, so should be placed outside of the BFD64 block.
> > 
> > No.  cris may be 32-bit but the bfd support requires a 64-bit bfd.
> > See config.bfd.
> > 
> 
> Interesting, I missed that. So I suppose GDB will need to move these cris
> files from ALL_TARGET_OBS to ALL_64_TARGET_OBS.
> 
> I see opcodes/Makefile.am also puts the cris files into
> TARGET32_LIBOPCODES_CFILES. Is that a mistake?

Hmm, maybe config.bfd is wrong.  I see cris files in bfd/Makefile.am
BFD32_BACKENDS.  Hans-Peter, do you know what is going on here?

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM