binutils as policy checker (was: RFC: Add a linker warning when creating segments with RWX permissions)

Matthias Klose doko@ubuntu.com
Tue May 3 20:29:51 GMT 2022


On 03.05.22 21:57, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 12:35 PM Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 28.04.22 11:46, Nick Clifton via Binutils wrote:
>>> Hi Guys,
>>>
>>>     OK, attached is v2 of my proposed patch.  The main features of this
>>>     new version are:
>>>
>>>       * There are now configure options which can turn off the generation
>>>         of linker warnings about the creation of executable segments and
>>>         the creation of executable stacks.  By default however not using
>>>         these configure options will result in the creation of a linker
>>>         with all of the warnings enabled.
>>>
>>>       * There is new linker command line option: --no-warn-rwx-segments
>>>         which disables the warnings about executable segments.
>>>
>>>       * There are tests for the new features, plus extra regexps in the
>>>         testsuite's pruning proc to remove the warnings from the linker's
>>>         output for normal tests.
>>>
>>>       * The creation of a TLS segment with eXecute permission will trigger
>>>         a warning, regardless of whether it has the read and/or write
>>>         permissions set.
>>>
>>>       * There is a new configure time option which will disable the
>>>         creation of an executable stack simply because an input file is
>>>         missing a .note-GNU-stack section (for those architectures where
>>>         such a creation is the normal behaviour).  This option is not
>>>         enabled by default however.  At least not yet.
>>>
>>>     I think that this represents the best compromise between helping to
>>>     promote secure builds whilst also allowing toolchain creators and
>>>     program builders the option to disable the features if they wish.
>>>
>>>     Any comments ?
>>
>> this commit contains a ld/aclocal.m4 generated with automake 1.16.  Please
>> re-create that file with automake 1.15.1. And maybe re-create the Makefile.in
>> also with the correct automake version.
>>
>> Thanks, Matthias
> 
> I am checking in this.

thanks, I see that zlib also processed with automake 1.16..2

Matthias


More information about the Binutils mailing list