[PATCH] x86: drop print_operand_value()'s "hex" parameter

Jan Beulich jbeulich@suse.com
Tue Jun 14 14:54:40 GMT 2022


On 14.06.2022 15:59, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 3:07 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>
>> For quite some  time all callers have been passing 1 / true. While there
>> fold the final oappend_with_style() calls.
>> ---
>> Instead of 0x%x I could see us using %#x, thus printing at least zero
>> without the redundant 0x prefix. Thoughts? (I expect there'll be quite a
> 
> 0x is clearer than 0 which is also used for octal.

How is 0x0 clearer than 0? There's also no ambiguity at all with octal:
0 represents zero for all of hex, dec, and octal.

Also - any word on the patch itself? The aspect here was brought up just
to figure whether there wants to be yet another change on top.

Jan

>> bit of testsuite fallout from such a change, but I don't think that's a
>> major concern.)
>>
>> --- a/opcodes/i386-dis.c
>> +++ b/opcodes/i386-dis.c
>> @@ -10969,61 +10969,22 @@ OP_indirE (instr_info *ins, int bytemode
>>  }
>>
>>  static void
>> -print_operand_value (instr_info *ins, bool hex, bfd_vma disp,
>> +print_operand_value (instr_info *ins, bfd_vma disp,
>>                      enum disassembler_style style)
>>  {
>>    char tmp[30];
>> +  unsigned int i = 0;
>>
>>    if (ins->address_mode == mode_64bit)
>>      {
>> -      if (hex)
>> -       {
>> -         int i;
>> -         oappend_with_style (ins, "0x", style);
>> -         sprintf_vma (tmp, disp);
>> -         for (i = 0; tmp[i] == '0' && tmp[i + 1]; i++);
>> -         oappend_with_style (ins, tmp + i, style);
>> -       }
>> -      else
>> -       {
>> -         bfd_signed_vma v = disp;
>> -         int i;
>> -         if (v < 0)
>> -           {
>> -             oappend_char_with_style (ins, '-', style);
>> -             v = -disp;
>> -             /* Check for possible overflow on 0x8000000000000000.  */
>> -             if (v < 0)
>> -               {
>> -                 oappend_with_style (ins, "9223372036854775808", style);
>> -                 return;
>> -               }
>> -           }
>> -         if (!v)
>> -           {
>> -             oappend_char_with_style (ins, '0', style);
>> -             return;
>> -           }
>> -
>> -         i = 0;
>> -         tmp[29] = 0;
>> -         while (v)
>> -           {
>> -             tmp[28 - i] = (v % 10) + '0';
>> -             v /= 10;
>> -             i++;
>> -           }
>> -         oappend_with_style (ins, tmp + 29 - i, style);
>> -       }
>> +      oappend_with_style (ins, "0x", style);
>> +      sprintf_vma (tmp, disp);
>> +      while (tmp[i] == '0' && tmp[i + 1])
>> +       ++i;
>>      }
>>    else
>> -    {
>> -      if (hex)
>> -       sprintf (tmp, "0x%x", (unsigned int) disp);
>> -      else
>> -       sprintf (tmp, "%d", (int) disp);
>> -      oappend_with_style (ins, tmp, style);
>> -    }
>> +    sprintf (tmp, "0x%x", (unsigned int) disp);
>> +  oappend_with_style (ins, tmp + i, style);
>>  }
>>
>>  /* Like oappend, but called for immediate operands.  */
>> @@ -11033,7 +10994,7 @@ oappend_immediate (instr_info *ins, bfd_
>>  {
>>    if (!ins->intel_syntax)
>>      oappend_char_with_style (ins, '$', dis_style_immediate);
>> -  print_operand_value (ins, true, imm, dis_style_immediate);
>> +  print_operand_value (ins, imm, dis_style_immediate);
>>  }
>>
>>  /* Put DISP in BUF as signed hex number.  */
>> @@ -11721,7 +11682,7 @@ OP_E_memory (instr_info *ins, int bytemo
>>             if (havedisp || riprel)
>>               print_displacement (ins, disp);
>>             else
>> -             print_operand_value (ins, true, disp, dis_style_address_offset);
>> +             print_operand_value (ins, disp, dis_style_address_offset);
>>             if (riprel)
>>               {
>>                 set_op (ins, disp, true);
>> @@ -11798,7 +11759,7 @@ OP_E_memory (instr_info *ins, int bytemo
>>               if (havedisp)
>>                 print_displacement (ins, disp);
>>               else
>> -               print_operand_value (ins, true, disp, dis_style_address_offset);
>> +               print_operand_value (ins, disp, dis_style_address_offset);
>>             }
>>
>>           oappend_char (ins, ins->close_char);
>> @@ -11825,7 +11786,7 @@ OP_E_memory (instr_info *ins, int bytemo
>>                   oappend_register (ins, att_names_seg[ds_reg - es_reg]);
>>                   oappend (ins, ":");
>>                 }
>> -             print_operand_value (ins, true, disp, dis_style_text);
>> +             print_operand_value (ins, disp, dis_style_text);
>>             }
>>         }
>>      }
>> @@ -11900,7 +11861,7 @@ OP_E_memory (instr_info *ins, int bytemo
>>               oappend_register (ins, att_names_seg[ds_reg - es_reg]);
>>               oappend (ins, ":");
>>             }
>> -         print_operand_value (ins, true, disp & 0xffff, dis_style_text);
>> +         print_operand_value (ins, disp & 0xffff, dis_style_text);
>>         }
>>      }
>>    if (ins->vex.b)
>> @@ -12370,7 +12331,7 @@ OP_J (instr_info *ins, int bytemode, int
>>    disp = ((ins->start_pc + (ins->codep - ins->start_codep) + disp) & mask)
>>          | segment;
>>    set_op (ins, disp, false);
>> -  print_operand_value (ins, true, disp, dis_style_text);
>> +  print_operand_value (ins, disp, dis_style_text);
>>  }
>>
>>  static void
>> @@ -12430,7 +12391,7 @@ OP_OFF (instr_info *ins, int bytemode, i
>>           oappend (ins, ":");
>>         }
>>      }
>> -  print_operand_value (ins, true, off, dis_style_address_offset);
>> +  print_operand_value (ins, off, dis_style_address_offset);
>>  }
>>
>>  static void
>> @@ -12459,7 +12420,7 @@ OP_OFF64 (instr_info *ins, int bytemode,
>>           oappend (ins, ":");
>>         }
>>      }
>> -  print_operand_value (ins, true, off, dis_style_address_offset);
>> +  print_operand_value (ins, off, dis_style_address_offset);
>>  }
>>
>>  static void
> 
> 
> 



More information about the Binutils mailing list