[PATCH] x86-64: Allocate input section memory if needed
Alan Modra
amodra@gmail.com
Wed Dec 28 22:06:58 GMT 2022
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 09:23:21AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 5:16 PM Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 11:47:56AM -0800, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
> > > + /* Cache the section contents for
> > > + elf_link_input_bfd. */
> > > + elf_section_data (sec)->this_hdr.contents
> > > + = contents;
> >
> > You shouldn't really be caching unaltered section contents when
> > !info->keep_memory. I'm not saying the patch is wrong, but please fix
> > this when you have some time.
> >
> > --
> > Alan Modra
> > Australia Development Lab, IBM
>
> elf_x86_64_scan_relocs has
>
> if (elf_section_data (sec)->this_hdr.contents != contents)
> {
> if (!converted && !_bfd_link_keep_memory (info))
> free (contents);
> else
> {
> /* Cache the section contents for elf_link_input_bfd if any
> load is converted or --no-keep-memory isn't used. */
> elf_section_data (sec)->this_hdr.contents = contents;
> info->cache_size += sec->size;
> }
> }
>
> Are you suggesting that it should be
No, the code above is correct and how it should be in
elf_x86_size_or_finish_relative_reloc. Of course it is a little more
complicated there due to handling multiple sections.
>
> if (elf_section_data (sec)->this_hdr.contents != contents)
> {
> if (!converted)
> free (contents);
> else
> {
> /* Cache the section contents for elf_link_input_bfd if any
> load is converted. */
> elf_section_data (sec)->this_hdr.contents = contents;
> info->cache_size += sec->size;
> }
> }
This would be wrong as it ignores info->keep_memory.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
More information about the Binutils
mailing list