[PATCH v2 2/2] gas: re-work line number tracking for macros and their expansions

[Luis Machado]

On 12/14/22 14:03, Luis Machado via Binutils wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm not yet sure how, but this patch has broken at least one gdb test (gdb.asm/asm-source.exp) for aarch64-linux (Ubuntu 22.04 and 20.04).
> 
> Could you please take a look at it? I can do some testing with the aarch64 machines if that's helpful.
> 
> FAIL: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: f at main
> FAIL: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: n at main
> FAIL: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: next over macro
> FAIL: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: list
> FAIL: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: f in foo2
> FAIL: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: n in foo2
> FAIL: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: bt ALL in foo2
> FAIL: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: bt 2 in foo2
> FAIL: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: bt 3 in foo3
> FAIL: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: finish from foo3
> FAIL: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: info source asmsrc2.s
> FAIL: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: info line
> FAIL: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: next over foo3
> FAIL: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: return from foo2
> 
>                  === gdb Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes            15
> # of unexpected failures        14
> 

I'm guessing if we build gas alongside gdb, then the gdb testsuite will use that new gas binary.

If something has changed in the format/structure of the output, we may need to adjust the testcase to match.