x86: limiting the use of No_*Suf

[Jan Beulich]

On 12.08.2022 11:30, Jan Beulich via Binutils wrote:
> since you didn't like "x86: imply all No_*Suf when none is set in a
> template" I've been thinking of other ways to limit the excessive use
> of these attributes. One observation is that templates with IsPrefix,
> Broadcast, or Masking set always have all No_<x>Suf also set.
> Therefore the latter could be dropped from those templates (improving
> readability), compensated by
> 1) a respective adjustment to match_template(), or
> 2) a change to i386-gen.c, or
> 3) respective pre-processor macros.
> Do you have any opinion on the general direction of this and, if in
> favor, any preference for one of the three options?

Actually I had forgotten that we already have precedent of 3), for
AddrPrefixOpReg. So perhaps this can be a hint as to further moves
in that direction ...

Jan