Get rid of fprintf_vma and sprintf_vma

[Jan Beulich]

On 01.08.2022 06:33, Alan Modra via Binutils wrote:
> --- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c
> +++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
> @@ -2377,15 +2377,8 @@ offset_in_range (offsetT val, int size)
>      }
>  
>    if ((val & ~mask) != 0 && (-val & ~mask) != 0)
> -    {
> -      char val_buf[128];
> -      char masked_buf[128];
> -
> -      /* Coded this way in order to ease translation.  */
> -      sprintf_vma (val_buf, val);
> -      sprintf_vma (masked_buf, val & mask);
> -      as_warn (_("0x%s shortened to 0x%s"), val_buf, masked_buf);
> -    }
> +    as_warn (_("0x%" PRIx64 " shortened to 0x%" PRIx64),
> +	     (uint64_t) val, (uint64_t) (val & mask));
>  
>    return val & mask;
>  }
> @@ -4913,12 +4906,8 @@ md_assemble (char *line)
>  	  i.types[j].bitfield.disp32 = 0;
>  	  if (i.types[j].bitfield.baseindex)
>  	    {
> -	      char number_buf[128];
> -
> -	      /* Coded this way in order to allow for ease of translation.  */
> -	      sprintf_vma (number_buf, exp->X_add_number);
> -	      as_bad (_("0x%s out of range of signed 32bit displacement"),
> -		      number_buf);
> +	      as_bad (_("0x%" PRIx64 " out of range of signed 32bit displacement"),
> +		      (uint64_t) exp->X_add_number);
>  	      return;
>  	    }
>  	}

Just as a general remark / question, seeing these changes: Wouldn't
it be slightly better to use the # modifier in cases like these? It's
one byte less of literal string space and results in zero to be
printed as plain "0" (no 0x prefix)?

As to the patch - I'm happy to see these two helper functions go away.
I do recall running into issues resulting from their use.

Jan