GDB 12.0.90 available for testing
Alan Modra
amodra@gmail.com
Mon Apr 18 01:48:59 GMT 2022
On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 10:33:59AM -0700, Joel Brobecker via Binutils wrote:
> Adding binutils@ to the list, since opcode is part of binutils.
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 06:20:24PM +0200, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
> > > From: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
> > > diff --git a/opcodes/Makefile.am b/opcodes/Makefile.am
> > > index afd19fa7785..681fbc07584 100644
> > > --- a/opcodes/Makefile.am
> > > +++ b/opcodes/Makefile.am
> > > @@ -124,6 +124,11 @@ TARGET32_LIBOPCODES_CFILES = \
> > > arm-dis.c \
> > > avr-dis.c \
> > > bfin-dis.c \
> > > + bpf-asm.c \
> > > + bpf-desc.c \
> > > + bpf-dis.c \
> > > + bpf-ibld.c \
> > > + bpf-opc.c \
> > > cgen-asm.c \
> > > cgen-bitset.c \
> > > cgen-dis.c \
Anything that requires 64-bit BFD support does not belong in
TARGET32_LIBOPCODES_CFILES. In fact, the whole point of
TARGET32_LIBOPCODES_CFILES was to fix --enable-targets=all breakage on
32-bit hosts without --enable-64-bit-bfd. Why would you want to put
bpf here? It's a 64-bit target!
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
More information about the Binutils
mailing list