On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 14:45 +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> > > Approved - please apply.
>
> (That was a hint to suggest that you could apply the patch yourself).
Oh sorry, didn't get that - but I'm not a maintainer so I don't think I
can do that?
> > Thank you - any update on committing it?
>
> Done. :-)
Thank you!
But looks like there was some fuzz or something like that? One part got
applied in the wrong section - from the original email:
@@ -19197,6 +19197,8 @@ get_note_type (Filedata * filedata, unsigned e_type)
return _("func");
case NT_GO_BUILDID:
return _("GO BUILDID");
+ case FDO_PACKAGING_METADATA:
+ return _("FDO_PACKAGING_METADATA");
default:
break;
}
Applied:
@@ -19220,6 +19220,8 @@ get_note_type (Filedata * filedata, unsigned e_type)
return _("NT_SIGINFO (siginfo_t data)");
case NT_FILE:
return _("NT_FILE (mapped files)");
+ case FDO_PACKAGING_METADATA:
+ return _("FDO_PACKAGING_METADATA");
default:
break;
}
But the latter doesn't work, as it's for ELF exec/libs rather than
corefiles:
Displaying notes found in: .note.package
Owner Data size Description
FDO 0x00000039 Unknown note type: (0xcafe1a7e)
Packaging Metadata: {"type":"deb","name":"fsverity-utils","version":"1.3-1"}
But it's an easy fix, sent a follow-up:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-December/118746.html
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20211201/ecca9234/attachment.sig>