The policy of creating vendor/users branches in binutils

[Nick Clifton]

Hi Guys,

On 4/27/21 6:53 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> If the only reason for using vendor/xxx was to follow what GCC does,
> I don't think it's a strong-enough reason to duplicate the configuration
> we already have for users/* to vendors/*. Just my 2 cents, of course.

OK - so Nelson - how much of a problem would it be for you to use 
/user/risc-v branches ?  (I assume that the same issue exists should you 
wish to create multiple gdb branches as well).

Cheers
   Nick