The policy of creating vendor/users branches in binutils

[Nelson Chu]

Hi Guys,

We (RISC-V) plan to create a series of binutils branches to place
vendors and draft stuff.  Are there any policies to create the vendor
branches in binutils?  I see that ARM has their own vendor branches in
/users/ARM/, and so as others.  But in GCC, vendor branches are used
to be placed in /vendors/<vendor name>/...  Therefore, could we create
branches in /vendors/RISC-V/ rather than in /users/RISC-V for
binutils?  It would be great if we can keep the consistency with GCC,
and also follow the policy of binutils.

Thank you very much
Nelson