gas: unhelpful sprint_value() behavior

[Jan Beulich]

Nick,

On 13.04.2021 14:12, Nick Clifton wrote:
>> Therefore, no, I don't think this ought to be a concern here. 
> 
> You make a good argument.  OK, please go ahead and make the change as 
> originally suggested.

will do. I notice though that the replacement function is
sprintf_vma()? Which, grep-ing for its definition and uses, made
me spot bfd_sprintf_vma(). I guess I prefer use that one as
replacement. Question is whether having both makes enough sense,
or whether sprintf_vma() could also be dropped (in a separate
change of course).

Jan