[PATCH] elf: Don't load archive element after dynamic definition

H.J. Lu hjl.tools@gmail.com
Wed Sep 2 11:56:48 GMT 2020


On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 1:12 AM Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 08:52:06AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> > On 8/28/20 4:50 PM, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
> > > PR ld/26530 test still failed.
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > Is there any progress on this please?
>
> I think what we want is the following, and some tweaking of the
> testsuite to remove FAIL: PR ld/15146 (1).  That test relied on not
> loading a shared lib due to an IR symbol reference, but the logic
> added by git commit 3d5bef4c0871 has already been reverted.
>
> diff --git a/bfd/elflink.c b/bfd/elflink.c
> index 5c085b14b7..346f534911 100644
> --- a/bfd/elflink.c
> +++ b/bfd/elflink.c
> @@ -4977,11 +4977,7 @@ elf_link_add_object_symbols (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
>              object and a shared object.  */
>           bfd_boolean dynsym = FALSE;
>
> -         /* Plugin symbols aren't normal.  Don't set def_regular or
> -            ref_regular for them, or make them dynamic.  */
> -         if ((abfd->flags & BFD_PLUGIN) != 0)
> -           ;
> -         else if (! dynamic)
> +         if (! dynamic)
>             {
>               if (! definition)
>                 {
> @@ -5162,10 +5158,6 @@ elf_link_add_object_symbols (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
>               && !bfd_link_relocatable (info))
>             dynsym = FALSE;
>
> -         /* Nor should we make plugin symbols dynamic.  */
> -         if ((abfd->flags & BFD_PLUGIN) != 0)
> -           dynsym = FALSE;
> -
>           if (definition)
>             {
>               h->target_internal = isym->st_target_internal;
> @@ -5192,7 +5184,7 @@ elf_link_add_object_symbols (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
>                 }
>             }
>
> -         if (dynsym && h->dynindx == -1)
> +         if (dynsym && (abfd->flags & BFD_PLUGIN) == 0 && h->dynindx == -1)
>             {
>               if (! bfd_elf_link_record_dynamic_symbol (info, h))
>                 goto error_free_vers;

Will it add a shared library to DT_NEEDED even if the IR symbol reference is
removed by LTO?

-- 
H.J.


More information about the Binutils mailing list