[PATCH] x86-64: correct mis-named X86_64_0D enumerator
Jan Beulich
jbeulich@suse.com
Thu Mar 12 07:37:11 GMT 2020
This is for major opcode 0E, so name it accordingly.
opcodes/
2020-03-XX Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
* i386-dis.c (X86_64_0D): Rename to ...
(X86_64_0E): ... this.
--- a/opcodes/i386-dis.c
+++ b/opcodes/i386-dis.c
@@ -1741,7 +1741,7 @@ enum
{
X86_64_06 = 0,
X86_64_07,
- X86_64_0D,
+ X86_64_0E,
X86_64_16,
X86_64_17,
X86_64_1E,
@@ -2379,7 +2379,7 @@ static const struct dis386 dis386[] = {
{ "orS", { Gv, EvS }, 0 },
{ "orB", { AL, Ib }, 0 },
{ "orS", { eAX, Iv }, 0 },
- { X86_64_TABLE (X86_64_0D) },
+ { X86_64_TABLE (X86_64_0E) },
{ Bad_Opcode }, /* 0x0f extended opcode escape */
/* 10 */
{ "adcB", { Ebh1, Gb }, 0 },
@@ -6815,7 +6815,7 @@ static const struct dis386 x86_64_table[
{ "popP", { es }, 0 },
},
- /* X86_64_0D */
+ /* X86_64_0E */
{
{ "pushP", { cs }, 0 },
},
More information about the Binutils
mailing list