[PATCH 5/6] x86: simplify check_byte_reg()
Jan Beulich
jbeulich@suse.com
Wed Jun 3 10:17:04 GMT 2020
With the introduction of what right now is the very first conditional
in the function's loop (commit dc821c5f9ae5 ["x86: replace Reg8, Reg16,
Reg32, and Reg64"]), the last if() in the same loop has become
pointless - retain just its body.
gas/
2020-06-XX Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
* config/tc-i386.c (check_byte_reg): Drop dead conditional
around as_bad().
--- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c
+++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
@@ -7132,21 +7132,10 @@ check_byte_reg (void)
continue;
/* Any other register is bad. */
- if (i.types[op].bitfield.class == Reg
- || i.types[op].bitfield.class == RegMMX
- || i.types[op].bitfield.class == RegSIMD
- || i.types[op].bitfield.class == SReg
- || i.types[op].bitfield.class == RegCR
- || i.types[op].bitfield.class == RegDR
- || i.types[op].bitfield.class == RegTR)
- {
- as_bad (_("`%s%s' not allowed with `%s%c'"),
- register_prefix,
- i.op[op].regs->reg_name,
- i.tm.name,
- i.suffix);
- return 0;
- }
+ as_bad (_("`%s%s' not allowed with `%s%c'"),
+ register_prefix, i.op[op].regs->reg_name,
+ i.tm.name, i.suffix);
+ return 0;
}
return 1;
}
More information about the Binutils
mailing list