[PATCH] x86: introduce %BW to avoid going through vex_w_table[]
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Mon Jul 6 12:13:16 GMT 2020
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:04 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On 06.07.2020 13:57, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 4:54 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This parallels %LW and %XW.
> >>
> >> opcodes/
> >> 2020-07-XX Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> >>
> >> * i386-dis.c (EVEX_W_0F3826_P_1, EVEX_W_0F3826_P_2,
> >> EVEX_W_0F3828_P_1, EVEX_W_0F3829_P_1, EVEX_W_0F3854_P_2,
> >> EVEX_W_0F3866_P_2, EVEX_W_0F3875_P_2, EVEX_W_0F387D_P_2,
> >> EVEX_W_0F388D_P_2, EVEX_W_0F3A3E_P_2, EVEX_W_0F3A3F_P_2):
> >> Delete.
> >> (putop): Handle "BW".
> >> * i386-dis-evex-w.h: Move entries for opcodes 0F3826, 0F3826,
> >> 0F3828, 0F3829, 0F3854, 0F3866, 0F3875, 0F387D, 0F388D, 0F3A3E,
> >> and 0F3A3F ...
> >> * i386-dis-evex-prefix.h: ... here.
> >>
> >
> > OK.
>
> Thanks. Any thoughts on the post-commit-message question, either way?
>
Yes, convert "LW" to "DQ" looks nice.
Thanks.
--
H.J.
More information about the Binutils
mailing list