[PATCH] gold: Make Ordering::operator() even more complex

[H.J. Lu]

GCC 9 generates the same function size for Ordering::operator() in
odr_violation1.cc and odr_violation2.cc on x32:

  134: 00000000    31 FUNC    WEAK   DEFAULT   64 _ZN8OrderingclEii
   40: 00000000    31 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   10 _ZN8OrderingclEii

This patch makes Ordering::operator() even more complex

   134: 00000000    31 FUNC    WEAK   DEFAULT   64 _ZN8OrderingclEii
    42: 00000000    35 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   11 _ZN8OrderingclEii

    	* testsuite/odr_violation2.cc (Ordering::operator()): Make
	expression even more complex.
---
 gold/testsuite/odr_violation2.cc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gold/testsuite/odr_violation2.cc b/gold/testsuite/odr_violation2.cc
index aa9868fc27c..35dd454704b 100644
--- a/gold/testsuite/odr_violation2.cc
+++ b/gold/testsuite/odr_violation2.cc
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ class Ordering {
 bool Ordering::operator()(int a, int b) {
   // Optimization makes this operator() a different size than the one
   // in odr_violation1.cc.
-  return a + 12345 > b / 67;
+  return (a * 30 + b + 12345) > b / 67;
 }
 
 void SortDescending(int array[], int size) {
-- 
2.24.1