[PATCH] readelf: Warn zero-sized relocation sections
Hans-Peter Nilsson
hp@bitrange.com
Wed Apr 22 02:51:38 GMT 2020
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.04.2020 12:01, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > I have been thinking about this. I was wondering what the best form
> > of such an option would be. I see three different possibilities:
> >
> > * Just warn about everything, and do not have an option.
(Not this one.)
> > * Have a --enable-warnings option which is off by default
> > and which disables *all* warnings unless enabled.
> > This would mean changing the current behaviour of readelf...
Hm; regarding "--enable-*". I don't mind the names, but you're
not going to make these *configure-time* options, right?
> >
> > * Have a --enable-extra-warnings option which enables the zero
> > sized section test but no others. (For now - in the future
> > I would envision us adding more tests). For this path I
> > think that it would also make sense to warn about any zero
> > sized section that does not have the SHT_NOBITS type.
>
> Of the three I'd vote for the last,
[...]
> > Or maybe:
> >
> > * Have a --enable-lint (or some such name) which enables testing
> > for conformance to the ELF standard, (plus strangeness things
> > like zero sized sections). This would count as a command option
> > in its own right, so that unless another option is provided
> > then only the warning/error messages would be displayed.
>
> Perhaps this one's best, albeit -
[...]
Agree with what Jan wrote (including what I pruned).
brgds, H-P
More information about the Binutils
mailing list