[PATCH] i386: Only check suffix in instruction mnemonic

[Jan Beulich]

On 13.11.2019 22:10,  H.J. Lu  wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 5:21 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 12.11.2019 21:43,  H.J. Lu  wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 11:16 PM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 11.11.2019 18:04,  H.J. Lu  wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 3:06 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On the positive side this fixes MOVDIRI handling: Previously only
>>>>>> the operand-size less cases below would have been accepted, whereas
>>>>>> now all 6 valid ones remain without diagnostic.
>>>>
>>>> (Leaving this in context for the question below.)
>>>>
>>>>>> Btw, would you mind me putting in the testsuite parts of the
>>>>>> alternative patches I had sent for this PR?
>>>>
>>>> [You didn't reply to this at all.]
>>>
>>> Sure, please submit a patch.
>>
>> Well, I did submit a pair of them already, and my question is if I
>> may put them in with the tc-i386.c change dropped.
> 
> Please submit a new one without the tc-i386.c change.

Done.

>  If it only updates Intel syntax tests, it is pre-approved.

I realize that strictly speaking I wouldn't have needed approval
here, and hence should simply have gone ahead anyway.

>>>>>>         movdiri [rcx], eax
>>>>>>         movdiri dword ptr [rcx], eax
>>>>>>         movdiri qword ptr [rcx], eax
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         movdiri [rcx], rax
>>>>>>         movdiri dword ptr [rcx], rax
>>>>>>         movdiri qword ptr [rcx], rax
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         .code32
>>>>>>         movdiri [ecx], eax
>>>>>>         movdiri dword ptr [ecx], eax
>>>>>>         movdiri qword ptr [ecx], eax
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you submit a patch?
>>>>
>>>> A patch to do what? Extend existing testcases? Shouldn't this
>>>> once again have been the job of the person adding support for
>>>> the insn?
>>>
>>> I'd like to avoid touching Intel syntax.
>>
>> So what are the answers to the first two questions then?
>>
> 
> What are the questions again?

You asked "Can you submit a patch?" which I responded to asking
"A patch to do what?"

Jan