[PATCH] x86: drop redundant SYSCALL/SYSRET templates

[Jan Beulich]

The Cpu64 forms are no different in their attributes except for the CPU
flags; there's no need to key these off of anything other than
CpuSYSCALL even for the 64-bit forms. Dropping these improves the
diagnostic on SYSRETQ used in 32-bit code from "unsupported instruction
`sysret'" to "invalid instruction suffix for `sysret'".

opcodes/
2019-11-XX  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@suse.com>

	* i386-opc.tbl (syscall, sysret): Drop Cpu64 forms.
	* i386-tbl.h: Re-generate.

--- a/opcodes/i386-opc.tbl
+++ b/opcodes/i386-opc.tbl
@@ -2797,9 +2797,7 @@ pswapd, 2, 0xf0f, 0xbb, 2, Cpu3dnowA, Mo
 
 // AMD extensions.
 syscall, 0, 0xf05, None, 2, CpuSYSCALL, No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { 0 }
-syscall, 0, 0xf05, None, 2, Cpu64, No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { 0 }
 sysret, 0, 0xf07, None, 2, CpuSYSCALL, DefaultSize|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_sSuf|No_ldSuf, { 0 }
-sysret, 0, 0xf07, None, 2, Cpu64, DefaultSize|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_sSuf|No_ldSuf, { 0 }
 swapgs, 0, 0xf01f8, None, 3, Cpu64, No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { 0 }
 rdtscp, 0, 0xf01f9, None, 3, CpuRdtscp, No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { 0 }