[PATCH 0/9] eBPF support for GNU binutils

[Edward Cree]

On 21/05/2019 20:34, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>     On 21/05/2019 19:18, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>     > I think Ed had an idea on how to specify BTF in asm syntax.
>     Specifically, see [1] for BTF as implemented in ebpf_asm, though note
>     that it doesn't (yet) cover .btf.ext or lineinfo.
>     
>     [1]: https://github.com/solarflarecom/ebpf_asm/tree/btfdoc#type-definitions
>
> Thanks for the reference.  I just checked out your `btfdoc' branch.  I
> will take a look.
>
> Where would you like to get feedback/suggestions/questions btw?
For ebpf_asm?  Either through GitHub Issues, or this address (ecree@solarflare.com).

I'm not actually on bpf@vger (though maybe I ought to subscribe...)

BTW I'm really happy to see someone working on eBPF support in the GNU
 toolchain; being tied to an LLVM monoculture has been bad for eBPF imho.

-Ed