[PATCH 2/2] [MIPS] Add i6500 CPU and fix i6400 default ASEs
Paul Hua
paul.hua.gm@gmail.com
Sat Apr 13 02:06:00 GMT 2019
Hi:
Which commit is your patch based on?
I based on 35add35e85c21f02e3e5808273cb77b24069b0aa, output is :
$ patch -p1 < patch/11.patch
patching file gas/config/tc-mips.c
Hunk #5 succeeded at 4136 with fuzz 1.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 16564.
Hunk #9 FAILED at 16578.
2 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
gas/config/tc-mips.c.rej
patching file gas/testsuite/gas/mips/elf_mach_p6600.d
patching file gas/testsuite/gas/mips/mips.exp
$ cat gas/config/tc-mips.c.rej
--- gas/config/tc-mips.c
+++ gas/config/tc-mips.c
@@ -16564,6 +16569,7 @@ parse_code_option (char * name)
mips_opts.arch = p->cpu;
mips_opts.isa = p->isa;
isa_set = TRUE;
+ mips_opts.init_ase = p->ase;
}
}
else if (strncmp (name, "mips", 4) == 0)
@@ -16578,6 +16584,7 @@ parse_code_option (char * name)
mips_opts.arch = p->cpu;
mips_opts.isa = p->isa;
isa_set = TRUE;
+ mips_opts.init_ase = p->ase;
}
}
else
Can you try the same commit ?
ps: My configure option is : ../configure --prefix=/opt/binutils
--target=mips64el-linux-gnu, then make ; make check.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:09 AM Faraz Shahbazker
<fshahbazker@wavecomp.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Paul
>
> On 04/11/2019 06:14 PM, Paul Hua wrote:
> >>> FAIL: ELF i6500 markings
> >> Did you perhaps miss [PATCH 1/2] [MIPS] Apply ASE information for the selected processor?
> > I apply both patches, but refused, I changed by hand, maybe I miss
> > something, please let your patch base new repo and resend it.
>
> I rebased and regenerated both the patches but the output of
> format-patch was identical to what I had posted earlier, except for the
> time-stamp. I don't see the point in re-posting them unless we can
> figure out the problem.
>
> Could this be a charset/encoding issue? It seems
> us-ascii/quoted-printable is the closest thing to plain-text that my
> mail server allows me to transmit.
>
> Regards,
> Faraz
More information about the Binutils
mailing list