[PATCH] elf: Report property change when merging properties

Nick Clifton nickc@redhat.com
Tue Nov 27 12:35:00 GMT 2018


Hi Guys,

>>> Merging property 0xc0000002 in foo.o (0x1) and bar.o (None): removed
>>
>> To me this is a confusing message.  How about simply saying "Removed
>> property 0xc0000002 in foo.o (0x1)", and similarly for the other

> This misses the crucial info that property 0xc0000002 is removed due to
> bar.o (None).

Indeed - this was my motivation for requesting the patch in the first place.

How about rewording the message as:

  Property 0xc00000002 (0x1) found in foo.o but removed from final link because it is not found in bar.o

A little bit more wordy perhaps, but I think that it explains what is going
on in clearer language.

Cheers
  Nick




More information about the Binutils mailing list