Feature request: improved build-id generation
Laura Abbott
labbott@redhat.com
Fri Mar 16 16:47:00 GMT 2018
On 03/15/2018 06:32 AM, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>> That might be an interesting alternative. Could you use this for e.g.
>> inserting a .comment section fragment with an unique (version) string?
>> That would be stripped away, but should still count for the build-id
>> hash calculation.
>
> If you know the value you want to store ahead of time, then it is easy:
>
> % cat comment.t
> SECTIONS
> {
> .comment (INFO) :
> {
> BYTE (0x12);
> BYTE (0x34);
> BYTE (0x56);
> BYTE (0x78);
> }
> }
>
> % gcc hello.c -Wl,comment.t
> % readelf -x.comment a.out
>
> Hex dump of section '.comment':
> 0x00000000 4743433a 2028474e 55292037 2e332e31 GCC: (GNU) 7.3.1
> 0x00000010 20323031 38303133 30202852 65642048 20180130 (Red H
> 0x00000020 61742037 2e332e31 2d322900 4743433a at 7.3.1-2).GCC:
> 0x00000030 2028474e 55292037 2e322e31 20323031 (GNU) 7.2.1 201
> 0x00000040 37303931 35202852 65642048 61742037 70915 (Red Hat 7
> 0x00000050 2e322e31 2d322900 12345678 .2.1-2)..4Vx
>
> (Note how the value has been appended to the .comment section).
>
> Unfortunately the linker does not have a STRING() operator to insert
> ascii codes into a section, so you have to construct the bytes by
> hand. Eg:
>
> % cat comment.t
> SECTIONS
> {
> .comment (INFO) :
> {
> BYTE (0x41);
> BYTE (0x42);
> BYTE (0x43);
> BYTE (0x00);
> }
> }
>
> % gcc hello.c -Wl,comment.t
> % readelf -p.comment a.out
>
> String dump of section '.comment':
> [ 0] GCC: (GNU) 7.3.1 20180130 (Red Hat 7.3.1-2)
> [ 2c] GCC: (GNU) 7.2.1 20170915 (Red Hat 7.2.1-2)
> [ 58] ABC
>
> A simple perl or python script could be used to create the comment.t
> linker script fragment.
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
I think this approach looks promising. I'm going to see about prototyping
this approach.
Thanks,
Laura
More information about the Binutils
mailing list