[PATCH] BFD/XCOFF: Fix storage class setting for weak defined symbols
Maciej W. Rozycki
macro@mips.com
Mon Jul 16 05:41:00 GMT 2018
Fix an issue with commit 8602d4fea60d ("Add AIX weak support"),
<https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-03/msg00189.html>, and use the
correct condition to set the storage class for weak defined symbols.
The context here is as follows:
else if ((h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defined
|| h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defweak)
&& h->smclas == XMC_XO)
{
BFD_ASSERT (bfd_is_abs_section (h->root.u.def.section));
isym.n_value = h->root.u.def.value;
isym.n_scnum = N_UNDEF;
if (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefweak
&& C_WEAKEXT == C_AIX_WEAKEXT)
isym.n_sclass = C_WEAKEXT;
else
isym.n_sclass = C_EXT;
aux.x_csect.x_smtyp = XTY_ER;
}
so clearly the inner condition can never be true. Correct the condition
then to check for the `bfd_link_hash_defweak' symbol type instead.
bfd/
* xcofflink.c (xcoff_write_global_symbol): Fix a symbol type
check for defined weak symbols.
---
Hi Richard,
Spotted in the course of PR ld/21375 work. Regression-tested with the
`powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0' target. I think a test case would be due, but I
can't afford writing one at this time, sorry. OK to apply?
BTW your XCOFF maintainer's address looks out of date to me.
Maciej
---
bfd/xcofflink.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: binutils/bfd/xcofflink.c
===================================================================
--- binutils.orig/bfd/xcofflink.c 2018-07-13 21:45:54.000000000 +0100
+++ binutils/bfd/xcofflink.c 2018-07-13 21:49:54.561733638 +0100
@@ -5592,7 +5592,7 @@ xcoff_write_global_symbol (struct bfd_ha
BFD_ASSERT (bfd_is_abs_section (h->root.u.def.section));
isym.n_value = h->root.u.def.value;
isym.n_scnum = N_UNDEF;
- if (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefweak
+ if (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defweak
&& C_WEAKEXT == C_AIX_WEAKEXT)
isym.n_sclass = C_WEAKEXT;
else
More information about the Binutils
mailing list