[PATCH] x86: Check the versioned __tls_get_addr symbol
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Sat Jan 20 22:37:00 GMT 2018
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 6:00 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 4:20 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:57:37AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> --- a/bfd/elfxx-x86.c
>>> +++ b/bfd/elfxx-x86.c
>>> @@ -856,7 +856,16 @@ _bfd_x86_elf_link_check_relocs (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
>>> htab->tls_get_addr,
>>> FALSE, FALSE, FALSE);
>>> if (h != NULL)
>>> - elf_x86_hash_entry (h)->tls_get_addr = 1;
>>> + {
>>> + elf_x86_hash_entry (h)->tls_get_addr = 1;
>>> +
>>> + /* Check the versioned __tls_get_addr symbol. */
>>> + while (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_indirect)
>>> + {
>>> + h = (struct elf_link_hash_entry *) h->root.u.i.link;
>>> + elf_x86_hash_entry (h)->tls_get_addr = 1;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>
>> I think it would be a little more bomb proof to pass follow=TRUE on
>> the elf_link_hash_lookup call, and then always test the flag on the
>> real symbol (which would mean a patch to elf_i386_check_tls_transition
>> and elf_x86_64_check_tls_transition). We have some really odd cases
>
> I'd like to keep the change as small as possible for backporting to
> 2.30.
>
>> in _bfd_elf_merge_symbol where a versioned symbol can end up pointing
>> at the undecorated symbol. So it might be possible to have
>> __tls_get_addr@VER -> __tls_get_addr -> __tls_get_addr@@VER
>> in which case you wouldn't set the flag on __tls_get_addr@VER.
>>
>
> But I do want to cover all bases. Do you have a testcase to show
> such a scenario so that I can verify that it is covered?
This is what I checked into master and 2.30 branch. We will
revisit it in the future if there is a testcase.
--
H.J.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-x86-Check-the-versioned-__tls_get_addr-symbol.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3807 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20180120/8514ebf5/attachment.bin>
More information about the Binutils
mailing list