Specify architecture for SPARC gas tests

[Rainer Orth]

Hi jose,

> I just checked and you can set OBJDUMPFLAGS before running
> run_dump_test.  What about doing something like this in sparc.exp:
>
> proc set_tests_arch {arch} {
>   global OBJDUMPFLAGS
>
>   if [istarget "sparc-solaris*"] {
>      set OBJDUMPFLAGS "-msparc:$arch"
>   }
> }
>
> [...]
>
> set_tests_mach v9m8
> run_dump_test "on"
> run_list_test "on-diag" "-64"
> ; ... other M8 tests
>
> set_tests_mach v9m
> run_dump_test "xcrypto"
> ; ... other M7 tests
>
> wdyt?

works for me.  The following patch passed testing on both
sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11.

At the occasion, I noticed that the ldtxa hadn't been run at all
before.  It's now included as well.

Ok for mainline?


Now, only two (quite weird) failures remain:

FAIL: sparc LDM/STM/LDMA/STMA

regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^  1c:  c7 88 64 66     ldmuh  \[ %g1 \+ 0x66 \], %g3$"
line   "  1c:   c7 88 64 66     ldmuh  [ 0x66 + %g1 ], %g3"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^  20:  c7 88 64 66     ldmuh  \[ %g1 \+ 0x66 \], %g3$"
line   "  20:   c7 88 64 66     ldmuh  [ 0x66 + %g1 ], %g3"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^  30:  c7 88 68 66     ldmsw  \[ %g1 \+ 0x66 \], %g3$"
line   "  30:   c7 88 68 66     ldmsw  [ 0x66 + %g1 ], %g3"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^  34:  c7 88 68 66     ldmsw  \[ %g1 \+ 0x66 \], %g3$"
line   "  34:   c7 88 68 66     ldmsw  [ 0x66 + %g1 ], %g3"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^  44:  c7 88 6c 66     ldmuw  \[ %g1 \+ 0x66 \], %g3$"
line   "  44:   c7 88 6c 66     ldmuw  [ 0x66 + %g1 ], %g3"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^  48:  c7 88 6c 66     ldmuw  \[ %g1 \+ 0x66 \], %g3$"
line   "  48:   c7 88 6c 66     ldmuw  [ 0x66 + %g1 ], %g3"

FAIL: sparc LDMF/STMF/LDMFA/STMFA

regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^  54:  c3 a8 7c 66     stmfd  %f32, \[ %g1 \+ 0x66 \]$"
line   "  54:   c3 a8 7c 66     stmfd  %f32, [ 0x66 + %g1 ]"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^  58:  c3 a8 7c 66     stmfd  %f32, \[ %g1 \+ 0x66 \]$"
line   "  58:   c3 a8 7c 66     stmfd  %f32, [ 0x66 + %g1 ]"

I can see no pattern here: in the first case, ldmsh, ldmx, and st* are
correct, in the second stmfs is.

	Rainer

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


2018-02-12  Jose E. Marchesi  <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
            Rainer Orth  <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

	* testsuite/gas/sparc/sparc.exp (set_tests_arch): New proc.
	Prefix v9c, v9d, v9v, v9m, v9m8 tests with corresponding
	set_tests_arch.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gas-sparc-objdump-arch.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3611 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20180212/afe112b2/attachment.bin>