[PATCH] Opcodes: (BRCLR / BRSET) Disassemble reserved codes instead of aborting.

[Nick Clifton]

Hi John,

> ping!

Sorry once again.

>      opcodes/
>      	* s12z-dis.c: BM_RESERVED1 to behave like BM_OPR_REG, and
>      	BM_RESERVED0 like BM_REG_IMM.

>      +2018-07-28  John Darrington  <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>
>      +
>      +	* testsuite/gas/s12z/bit-manip-invalid.d: New file.
>      +	* testsuite/gas/s12z/bit-manip-invalid.s: New file.
>      +	* testsuite/gas/s12z/s12z.exp: Add them.
>      +

Approved - please apply.

>      + /* The NXP documentation is vague about BM_RESERVED0 and BM_RESERVED1,
>      +    and contains obvious typos.
>      +    However the Freescale tools and experiments with the chip itself
>      +    seem to indicate that they behave like BM_REG_IMM and BM_OPR_REG
>      +    respectively.  */

I have to say that this is a little bit suspicious.  If they behave the 
in the same way as already defined modes, then why are they used at all ?

Plus of course the name implies that they are reserved for a use that has
yet to be defined, and should, by implication, not be used at the moment.

Cheers
  Nick