[PATCH 3/6] x86: improve operand reversal

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 03.08.18 at 17:30, <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:08 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 02.08.18 at 18:43, <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Please don't make any changes to the deprecated ".s".
>>
>> Excuse me, but how many more times should I state that I don't
>> make any changes to its behavior? I solely make {store} no longer
>> match .s in behavior. In fact I've specifically undone the change
>> to .s, in anticipation of your objection to any adjustment to it.
> 
> Why do you change testcases of the .s suffix?

s/change/add to/

Deprecated or no, I think the .s suffix should still work, including
not causing assembly to fail when used. Try assembling the
additions without the source adjustments, and I think you'll find
some will fail. To me such adjustments are not "changes to its
behavior" in the sense that I might break anything that has
worked before. The perspective to take is that for the existing
test cases the behavior doesn't change. I'm sorry for not having
spelled it out this way before. I sincerely hope you don't mean
me to break again what I've just fixed, just to make sure the
behavior doesn't change _at all_.

Jan