[PATCH 2/3] x86: use correct register names

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 14.11.17 at 14:42, <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 14.11.17 at 13:33, <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> A test for this is going to be introduced in the next patch of this
>>>> series.
>>
>> Did you read the above ...
>>
>>> Please use .byte directive to add 3 testcases for each case to verify
>>> that disassembler
>>> properly ignores this bit.   OK with that change.
>>
>> ... before replying?
> 
> Please make each patch self-contained by including relevant tests in
> each patch.

You clearly show no appreciation at all for other people's time. It
was for a reason that back then I had told you that the patch
shouldn't be split up. Now that I did the split, you start splitting
hair. If it wasn't burdensome to carry a growing set of bug fixes
in my own trees, this behavior would likely drive me to stop
submitting x86 bugfixes (outside the area I'm maintainer for)
altogether. The more that I would really consider you as the
maintainer of that code to be the one primarily interested in
getting such bugs fixed, quite reasonably including you doing so
yourself, and in quite a few cases you not easily allowing in half
baked or inconsistent patches, but then making a big deal of
someone else trying to address all those shortcomings.

Jan