[PATCH] x86: ignore high register select bit(s) in 32- and 16-bit modes

H.J. Lu hjl.tools@gmail.com
Wed Feb 22 19:03:00 GMT 2017


On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> While commits 9889cbb14e ("Check invalid mask registers") and
> abfcb414b9 ("X86: Ignore REX_B bit for 32-bit XOP instructions") went a
> bit into the right direction, this wasn't quite enough:
> - VEX.vvvv has its high bit ignored
> - EVEX.vvvv has its high bit ignored together with EVEX.v'
> - the high bits of {,E}VEX.vvvv should not be prematurely zapped, to
>   allow proper checking of them when the fields has to hold al ones
> - when the high bits of an immediate specify a register, bit 7 is
>   ignored
> - GPR names should be determined base on REX_W rather than vex.w
>
> gas/
> 2017-02-21  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@suse.com>
>
>         * gas/testsuite/gas/i386/noextreg.s,
>         gas/testsuite/gas/i386/noextreg.d: New.
>         * testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp: Run new test.
>
> opcodes/
> 2017-02-21  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@suse.com>
>
>         * i386-dis.c (VEXI4_Fixup, VexI4): Delete.
>         (prefix_table): Remove uses of VexI4.
>         (get_valid_dis386): Never flag bad opcode when
>         vex.register_specifier is beyond 7. Always store all four
>         bits of it. Move 16-/32-bit override in EVEX handling after
>         all to be overridden bits have been set.
>         (OP_VEX): Mask vex.register_specifier outside of 64-bit mode.
>         Use rex to determine GPR register set.
>         (OP_EX_VexReg, OP_Vex_2src_1, OP_Vex_2src_2): Mask
>         vex.register_specifier outside of 64-bit mode.
>         (OP_EX_VexW): Advance codep when 2nd pass done, deferring the
>         setting of vex_w_done until after that.
>         (OP_REG_VexI4): Don't check low four immediate bits. Mask
>         vex.register_specifier outside of 64-bit mode.
>         (OP_LWPCB_E): Use rex to determine GPR register set.
>         (OP_LWP_E): Likewise. Mask vex.register_specifier outside of
>         64-bit mode.
>

> @@ -16937,7 +16928,7 @@ OP_VEX (int bytemode, int sizeflag ATTRI
>           names = names_xmm;
>           break;
>         case dq_mode:
> -         if (vex.w)
> +         if (rex & REX_W)
>             names = names64;
>           else
>             names = names32;

Do you have a testcase where vex.w != rex & REX_W?


-- 
H.J.



More information about the Binutils mailing list