PATCH: Add elf64.lo together with elfxx-x86.lo for 64-bit BFD
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Thu Aug 31 02:33:00 GMT 2017
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 08:49:21AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
>> I'm testing the following fix.
>>
>> * opncls.c (bfd_close_all_done): Don't call bfd_cache_close
>> before _close_and_cleanup. Call iovec->bclose after.
>> (bfd_close): Remove code common to, and call bfd_close_all_done.
>
> Now committed. The test run showed breakage of all x86 non-ELF
> targets.
>
> ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(elfxx-x86.o): In function `_bfd_x86_elf_link_hash_table_create':
> /home/alan/src/binutils-gdb/bfd/elfxx-x86.c:269: undefined reference to `elf64_r_info'
> /home/alan/src/binutils-gdb/bfd/elfxx-x86.c:270: undefined reference to `elf64_r_sym'
>
I am going to check in this.
--
H.J.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Add-elf64.lo-together-with-elfxx-x86.lo-for-64-bit-B.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2030 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20170831/b4ef201d/attachment.bin>
More information about the Binutils
mailing list