problem with binutils 2.29 for microblaze
Michael Eager
eager@eagerm.com
Tue Aug 8 13:58:00 GMT 2017
On 08/08/2017 02:29 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 10:21:27AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 08:04:18PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This issue was reported in Januar:
>>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21017
>>>
>>> I reported the musl build failure via IRC to Rich.
>>> He opened up the ticket and suggested a fix.
>>> The fix is included in Binutils 2.29.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately it breaks uClibc-ng shared library loader.
>>
>> Yes, the binutils patch is incorrect. It causes got.refcount to be
>> incremented for a GOTOFF relocation, when such relocations should not
>> cause a GOT entry to be created. Easily fixed.
>
> I may as well commit the patch to fix the GOTOFF problem. I've
> verified that it builds ld-uClibc-1.0.26.so without _NONE relocs.
>
> PR 21017
> * elf32-microblaze.c (microblaze_elf_check_relocs): Don't bump
> got.refcount for GOTOFF relocs, just create .got section.
>
> diff --git a/bfd/elf32-microblaze.c b/bfd/elf32-microblaze.c
> index 2657736..94ef09e 100644
> --- a/bfd/elf32-microblaze.c
> +++ b/bfd/elf32-microblaze.c
> @@ -2353,7 +2353,6 @@ microblaze_elf_check_relocs (bfd * abfd,
> dogottls:
> sec->has_tls_reloc = 1;
> /* Fall through. */
> - case R_MICROBLAZE_GOTOFF_64:
> case R_MICROBLAZE_GOT_64:
> if (htab->elf.sgot == NULL)
> {
> @@ -2374,6 +2373,17 @@ microblaze_elf_check_relocs (bfd * abfd,
> }
> break;
>
> + case R_MICROBLAZE_GOTOFF_64:
> + case R_MICROBLAZE_GOTOFF_32:
> + if (htab->elf.sgot == NULL)
> + {
> + if (htab->elf.dynobj == NULL)
> + htab->elf.dynobj = abfd;
> + if (!_bfd_elf_create_got_section (htab->elf.dynobj, info))
> + return FALSE;
> + }
> + break;
> +
> case R_MICROBLAZE_64:
> case R_MICROBLAZE_64_PCREL:
> case R_MICROBLAZE_32:
>
OK with me.
--
Michael Eager eager@eagercon.com
1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077
More information about the Binutils
mailing list