ld.so binding time

[Yubin Ruan]

2017-08-01 16:04 GMT+08:00 Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>:
> On Aug 01 2017, Yubin Ruan <ablacktshirt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So, for the `open' symbol,
>>     open_t open;
>
> This is a pointer.
>
>> is different from
>>     int open(const char *pathname, int flags, ...);
>
> This is a function.

If those are two different types, then why would ld.so resolve a
`open()' system call to a pointer and then make it throw a segfault?
If those are two different types, then I think ld.so should bypass my
"customized pointer". But it seems not to be the case.

Yubin