[gold] 2.27 generates GOT where 2.26 did not

[Jethro Beekman]

On 11-08-16 20:10, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Jethro Beekman <binutils@jbeekman.nl> wrote:
>> Is this a regression in 2.27? I really don't want to use the GOT. Is there a
>> flag I can pass to get the old behavior?
> 
> IIRC this is correct behavior for x86_64 due to copy relocs.

I get the same thing if I pass -Wl,-z,nocopyreloc

Jethro