[PATCH] use xstrdup and concat more

[Trevor Saunders]

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:26:29AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:55:50AM -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:31:36PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 03:44:56AM -0400, tbsaunde+binutils@tbsaunde.org wrote:
> > > > --- a/gas/config/obj-elf.c
> > > > +++ b/gas/config/obj-elf.c
> > > > @@ -949,9 +949,7 @@ obj_elf_section_name (void)
> > > >  	  return NULL;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > -      name = (char *) xmalloc (end - input_line_pointer + 1);
> > > > -      memcpy (name, input_line_pointer, end - input_line_pointer);
> > > > -      name[end - input_line_pointer] = '\0';
> > > > +      name = xstrndup (input_line_pointer, end - input_line_pointer);
> > > >  
> > > >        while (flag_sectname_subst)
> > > >          {
> > > 
> > > Is this a good idea, here, and in other places where the original uses
> > > memcpy and strlen was not called to find the string length?  I'm
> > > thinking that xstrndup will be needlessly calling strlen.
> > 
> > I guess that's true, I'm not sure if that really matters though?
> 
> Quite possibly not.  I wasn't rejecting the patch and didn't see
> anything in the patch that raised a red flag.  It was more a case
> of asking you to think about possible performance effects when tidying
> code.  Fewer lines of code is not always better.

Of course ;)  I think most of it is around section names which I imagine
isn't very hot.  What would you like to do here?

Trev

> 
> -- 
> Alan Modra
> Australia Development Lab, IBM