Release 0.26: branching
Joseph Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Tue Nov 17 15:34:00 GMT 2015
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> My suggestion would be to run a lighter weight version of the GCC
> development process (which I think works very well overall) with perhaps
> a 5-month development window followed by a one month stabilization
> window. At the end of that month the release branch is cut and a
> release made from it once the code is suitably validated. Backporting
This sounds like the glibc release process (except that glibc releases are
made from master and the branch then made with the release point as the
branch point).
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Binutils
mailing list